Bibliography

  • “An Unfortunate Revision”. Barton, Chris. NZ Herald. Last modified August 15 2009. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10590850.
  • Brookes, Barbara. “The Making of a Controversy.” The Cartwright Papers: Essays on the Cervical Cancer Inquiry, 1987-88, eds. Joanna Manning (Bridget Williams Books, 2009).
  • Bryder, Linda (2009). A history of the ‘unfortunate experiment’ at National Women’s Hospital. Auckland, N.Z.: Auckland University Press. ISBN 9781869404352.
  • Bryder, Linda. “Unfortunate Experiment or Medical Uncertainties?” Auckland Medico-Legal Journal (2011).
  • Bunkle, Philidia, Women’s Studies Journal, Volume 24 Number 2, November 2010: 8-24. ISSN 1173-6615
  • Bunkle, Philida. “Patient-Centred ethics, the Cartwright Inquiry and Feminism: Identifying the Central Fallacy in Linda Bryder, A History of the ‘Unfortunate Experiment at National Women’s Hospital”, Women’s Studies Journal, 24, 2 (2010): 8-24.
  • Cartwright, Silvia (5 August 1988). The Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Allegations Concerning the Treatment of Cervical Cancer at National Women’s Hospital and into Other Related Matters. Auckland: Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-473-00664-2. 
  • “Cartwright Inquiry,” Women’s Health Action. accessed October 9, 2016, http://www.womens-health.org.nz/consumer-rights/cartwright-inquiry/.
  • Collins, Gail. America’s Women: 400 Years of Dolls, Drudges, Helpmates, and Heroines. New York: Harper Collins, 2004
  • Coney, Sandra; Bunkle, Phillida (June 1987). “An Unfortunate Experiment at National Women’s” (PDF). Metro. Auckland. pp. 47–65. Retrieved 23 August 2016.
  • “Controversy over the ‘Unfortunate Experiment’ ”. Anne Else. Scoop. Last modified August 17 2009, http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0908/S00133.htm.
  • Else, Ann. “The ‘unfortunate experiment’ and the Cartwright Inquiry, twenty years on: why getting it right matters.” Women’s Studies Journal 24, 2 (2010).
  • Hall, David and Lilleyman, J.S., “Reflecting on Redfern: What Can We Learn from the Alder Hey Story?”, Archives of Diseases of Childhood 84 (2001): 455-456
  • Joanna Manning (2009) The Cartwright papers: essays on the cervical cancer inquiry, 1987-88, Wellington, N.Z: Bridget Williams Books, Ltd..
  • McIndoe, WA; McLean, MR; Jones, RW; Mullins, PR (October 1984). “The invasive potential of carcinoma in situ of the cervix”.Obstetrics and gynecology. 64 (4): 451–8. PMID 6483293.
  • New Zealand. 1988. The report of the Committee of Inquiry into Allegations Concerning the Treatment of Cervical Cancer at National Women’s Hospital and Into Other Related Matters, 1988. Auckland, N.Z.: The Committee.
  • Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) (June 23, 2005). “Protection of Human Subjects”. Title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46. US Department of Health and Human Services.
  • Office of the Secretary, United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare (18 April 1979). “Protection of Human Subjects; Notice of Report for Public Comment” (PDF). Federal Register.
  • Patterson, Ron. “The Cartwright Legacy: Shifting the Focus of Attention from the Doctor to the Patient”. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 123, 1319 (2010): 6-10.
  • Paul, Charlotte. “Internal and External Morality of Medicine: Lessons from New Zealand”. British Medical Journal, 320, 7233 (2000) : 499-503.
  • “The Nuremberg Code”, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, accessed 20 October 2016, <https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code&gt;.
  • “WMA Declaration of Helsinki- Ethical Principles for Medical Research involving Human Subjects”, World Medical Association, accessed 20 October 2016, <http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/&gt;.

 

Disclaimer: As discussed with Gonzalo, we found finding archival images very difficult. It is for this reason our images are not from archival sources.